- About Homelessness
- News & Events
- Take Action
- About Us
- Ramping Up Rapid Re-Housing Series
The Budget Control Act and “Fiscal Cliff”: Impact on Ending Homelessness
Federal Policy Brief | July 14, 2012
The August 2011 Budget Control Act (BCA) and other upcoming budget-related issues have critical implications for efforts to prevent and end homelessness. The BCA makes deep cuts over the next decade to federal “discretionary” spending (which is determined each year through the congressional appropriations process, as opposed to mandatory spending like Medicaid which happens automatically). It includes virtually all affordable housing and targeted homelessness programs within HUD and other federal agencies.
The BCA contains two major provisions to reduce federal debt:
Step 2 of the spending cuts is scheduled to begin in January 2013. These cuts will be split evenly between defense and non-defense programs. They will come from some mandatory programs, but most mandatory programs that affect low-income people are exempt, including Medicaid, SSI, Social Security, TANF, and SNAP. All VA programs are exempt as well. However, HUD programs, as well as Health Care for the Homeless, SAMHSA Homeless Services, and other targeted homelessness programs, are not exempt.
In January 2013, these cuts will be implemented through a “sequester:” an across-the-board cut to all non-exempt programs below the level that Congress appropriates for FY 2013. For FY 2013, non-defense discretionary spending is expected to be cut by about 8.4 percent compared to FY 2012. Congress is currently drafting FY 2013 appropriations bills under the caps set by Step 1 above of the BCA. Then, in January 2013, this across-the-board sequestration will go into effect, resulting in about an 8 percent cut to nonexempt, non-defense discretionary programs, including nearly all affordable housing and homelessness programs. Sequestration will be indiscriminate, cutting high-priority, extremely effective programs (like HUD’s Homeless Assistance Grants) by exactly the same percentage as lower-priority, less efficient programs.
In addition to sequestration, several other budgetary events, including the expiration of both long-term unemployment insurance and the Bush-era tax cuts, are scheduled to hit in early 2013. Together, these events would have a significant impact on efforts to end homelessness by hurting the economy. Economists largely agree that raising taxes and reducing spending by this much in one year would make unemployment substantially worse. Persistent high unemployment has already sent millions of people to shelters, and further unemployment would hit homeless assistance systems hard.